loolooland
loolooland loolooland
  • 01-02-2021
  • English
contestada

Wikipedia is not considered a credible source, because the information it publishes is not:

Wikipedia is not considered a credible source because the information it publishes is not class=

Respuesta :

jrmcbride05
jrmcbride05 jrmcbride05
  • 01-02-2021

Answer:

Written by profesionals

Explanation:

Wikipedia alows anyone to post information as facts. Some people know what they are talking about and are correct but the site has been proven to give faulse information because the content isn't written by experts on the subject. Hope this helps :)

Answer Link

Otras preguntas

PLEASE HELP ASAP Completa los titulares con hay que o tiene u que 1.Estas Navidades_____regular el disco de Shakira. 2.101 libros que_____leer antes de dormir.
Help with this question not sure why it’s confusing me
PLEASE HELP ME!!!!!!!!!!!!
Two cyclists start from the same point at the same time and move in opposite directions. One cyclist is traveling at 7 mph, and the other cyclist is traveling
An executive for a large national restaurant chain with multiple locations in each of 513 counties wants to personally sample the cleanliness of the chain's res
Which statement about the slopes of the functions is true?
Amount received on Rs 30000 for 2 years at the rate of 11% per annum is
What is 2+2. Will give brainliest!
2 1/3 ÷y=1 2/5 ÷(−1.1)
Explain why diamonds are useful for electrodes in batteries