loolooland
loolooland loolooland
  • 01-02-2021
  • English
contestada

Wikipedia is not considered a credible source, because the information it publishes is not:

Wikipedia is not considered a credible source because the information it publishes is not class=

Respuesta :

jrmcbride05
jrmcbride05 jrmcbride05
  • 01-02-2021

Answer:

Written by profesionals

Explanation:

Wikipedia alows anyone to post information as facts. Some people know what they are talking about and are correct but the site has been proven to give faulse information because the content isn't written by experts on the subject. Hope this helps :)

Answer Link

Otras preguntas

If a slope of a line is 2/0 is it 0 or undefined?
Jim’s allowance is $1.20 per week. Stan’s is 25¢ per day. How long will they have to save, if they save both their allowances together, before they can get a m
which state of matter has the least amount of energy?
If Walt can paint 25 feet of fence in an hour, and Joe can paint 35 feet in an hour, how many minutes will it take them to paint a 150-foot fence, if they work
Which of the following organisms can perform alcoholic fermentation? (1) yeast, (2) humans, (3) bacteria. a. 1 and 2 b. 1 and 3 c. 1 only d. 1, 2, and 3
An airplane travels 3,260 kilometers in 4 hours. What is the airplane’s average speed?
Which of the kingdoms has the smallest number of known species
The length of a diagonal of a cube with edge length 25cm
If a slope of a line is 2/0 is it 0 or undefined?
Which of the following statements is true concerning LUCA? (1) LUCA was a cell. (2) All life on Earth evolved from LUCA. (3) LUCA probably existed probably arou